EDUC 7105: Module 2 Assignment

"[Learning] is multi-facetted and that is why developing new models for “learning” is so difficult…there are too many levels for one school of thought or one model to do it all" (Kapp, 2007). I agree with Kapp and Kerr on the fact that each theory (Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism) is beneficial to learning and educators can use some of each -ism to be effective teachers. There is a time and place for each theory, as Kapp suggested. When needing to memorize or recognize, educators can use behaviorism. For technical or "rule-based" learning, the emphasis can be on cognitivism. When learners are problem-solving or collaborating, then constructivism should be the focus. The educational pendulum is constantly swinging back and forth and there will always be a new theory or strategy that educators need to try. Most of the time, it is the same concept with a new name and a few tweaks. In order to reach as many learning styles as possible, educators should rely on a little from each of the -isms. 

References:

Kerr, B. (2007, January 1). _isms as filter, not blinker [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://billkerr2.blogspot.com/2007/01/isms-as-filter-not-blinker.html

Kapp, K. (2007, January 2). Out and about: Discussion on educational schools of thought [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.kaplaneduneering.com/kappnotes/index.php/2007/01/out-and-about-discussion-on-educational/